A discussion of how
this century has gotten off to such a bad start.
In other words: A discussion of The Bush Administration
- Friday, September 03, 2004 -
A Couple of Days After 9/11
I wrote the following:
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001
Subject: war
I was looking at Bush with his megaphone standing atop debris and death and destruction downtown today with a smile on his face. It reminded me of that look he got during the second debate during the discussion of a man on death row in Texas. His eyes lit up and he came to life, sparkling and grinning, in an upbeat voice. "And guess what? He's gonna be put to death!" Today he talks about praying and revenge, feeding off of a crowd chanting "USA! USA! USA!" like we're two minutes before kickoff at the Superbowl.
Next I'm looking at the Armory, live. Photos of missing people everywhere. People crying, grieving, numb, disbelieving, clinging to empty hope. The number is nearly 4,800 missing.
Random thoughts: when and if we ever get out of this, how large is that number going to get, Arabs included? And to what end? What are we going to get out of it? Are we going to be safer? Right now everyone I know is afraid to drive under tunnels and over bridges, they don't want to take the subway, they're afraid to fly. How is a big war going to change this dread? And what does the other side (whoever that is) stand to gain? After we kill a whole bunch of them, and they manage to get some of us, and this continues year after year after year, what will we be killing for? Some of you have children. What if ten or eleven years from now, when this is still going on, they have to go and fight? Are you prepared to deliver them into a holy war of attrition, against an enemy who only wants to die, and take as many of us with him as he can? How do you fight that?
America fought a war of attrition against the Japanese in WWII, and it was clear from the get go that we would have to kill every single one of them, because they wouldn't stop fighting, even when outnumbered and outgunned. We dropped two nuclear bombs. It was clear that we were perfectly prepared to keep dropping them until they were all dead. So they surrendered, even though up to that point there had been no word in Japanese for this concept. In fact, when terms were translated to the Japanese people from the emperor, he said something like, "We have not been successful pursuing our goal in this manner. We must lay down our arms and pursue our goal another way." (Which they did.) Ever since, America has not been successful in defeating an enemy who is willing to sacrifice more than 60% of its fighting force in any theater of war. What this says to me is, unless we vaporize every last one of them, it isn't over until we give up, not having achieved our goals, after years and years of fighting. From my earliest memories we were a country at war, and this went on until I was fifteen. It was truly a strange feeling to suddenly not be at war one day. War was all I knew. All I understood at that time was that I had no idea why we were sending our guys over there to die, year in, year out.
Here we go again.
From today's New York Times (9/3/04), Bob Herbert:
When asked this week on CNN how long the U.S. military is likely to remain in Iraq, Senator John McCain replied "probably" 10 or 20 years. "That's not so bad," he said, adding, "We've been in Korea for 50 years. We've been in West Germany for 50 years."
If Senator McCain is correct (and the belief in official Washington is that he is), then boys and girls who are 5 or 10 years old now will get their chance in 2015 or 2020 to strap on the Kevlar and engage the Iraqi "insurgents" who, like the indigenous forces we fought in Vietnam, will never accept the occupation of their country by America.
Marcina Hale, a protester who came to New York this week from suburban Westport, Conn., said she has two teenage boys and that Iraq "is not a war that I'm willing to send my sons to." As the years pass and the casualties mount, that sentiment will only grow.
Despite all the macho posturing and self-congratulating at the Republican convention, the wave of terror that's been unleashed on the world is only growing. The American-led war in Iraq is feeding that wave, causing it to swell rather than ebb.
Discussions about the nation's real enemies were taboo. We don't know where they are or what they're up to. The over-the-top venom of some of the speakers and delegates was reserved not for Osama, but for a couple of mild-mannered guys named John. ... If we're going to be in Iraq for 10 or 20 more years, the policy makers should say so, and tell us what that will cost in money and human treasure. The violence associated with such a long-term occupation is guaranteed ....
This is a "team" blog. We are a bunch of
Americans, whose rising distress
in our leader's decisions brought us together to make this site.
As Bush said, he's a "uniter." Many of us have never even met.
That's the internet for you.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the
president, or that we are to stand by the president, right or wrong, is
not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the
American people."
- Teddy Roosevelt
"Government has a final responsibility for the well-being of
its citizenship. If private cooperative endeavor fails to provide work
for willing hands and relief for the unfortunate, those suffering
hardship from no fault of their own have a right to call upon the
Government for aid; and a government worthy of its name must make
fitting response."
- Franklin Delano Roosevelt
"I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and Constitutions, but laws must and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change, with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors."
- Thomas Jefferson
"The means of defense against foreign danger historically have become the instruments of tyranny at home."
"All men having power ought to be distrusted to a certain
degree."
- James Madison
"I believe in human dignity as the source of national purpose, in human liberty as the source of national action, in the human heart as the source of national compassion, and in the human mind as the source of our invention and our ideas. It is, I believe, the faith in our fellow citizens as individuals and as people that lies at the heart of the liberal faith. For liberalism is not so much a party creed or set of fixed platform promises as it is an attitude of mind and heart, a faith in man's ability through the experiences of his reason and judgment to increase for himself and his fellow men the amount of justice and freedom and brotherhood which all human life deserves." - John F. Kennedy
"Should any political party attempt to abolish social security, unemployment insurance, and eliminate labor laws and farm programs, you would not hear of that party again in our political history. There is a tiny splinter group, of course, that believes you can do these things. Among them are [a] few other Texas oil millionaires, and an occasional politician or business man from other areas. Their number is negligible and they are stupid."
- Dwight D. Eisenhower
More Sites we often
like:
more coming...
"There's nothing wrong with America that can't be fixed by what's right with America." - Bill Clinton.
Hey, this is what our banner looks like. You like it?
Hey, feel free to put it on your site and link it to here.
We'd really appreciate it.
you don't have to of course, but if you do that's great.