A discussion of how
this century has gotten off to such a bad start.
In other words: A discussion of The Bush Administration
- Friday, November 12, 2004 -
ahem!... One moment... there... right... got it. There, now with my tin foil hat properly in place I'd like to tell ya something.
Florida is this election's Florida (or how Saint Ralph is trying to redeem himself)
Now things are getting more interesting.
Ohio is getting a lot of news now as the strangest of bedfellows (the libertarian and green parties) have gotten together and demanded a recount. Now of course they have to pay for it. If you want to help them you can go to The Green Party's Presidential recount page to donate, or if you are a conservative who just hates what Bush is doing to your nation and to the conservative agenda and thus can't stomach donating to the Green party, you can go to the Libertarian candidate's page.
So all eyes will be directed to the abundant weirdness of Ohio. Some of the issues of election night can't be undone (as to why in heavily populate precincts with a high proportion of African Americans there was only one or two voting machines (thus giving us the infamous 5, 7, even 9 hour waits), while more sparsely populate "white" areas had more then enough machines (no wait... or just a few minutes)). Nothing can be done for those situations save for improving the situation next time (wasn't there already a war about giving African Americans the right to vote? (not to even mention the civil rights movement)). There are other things in Ohio that could change the numbers (maybe not the results... but it is definitely closer then what we are hearing).
But I think the big news is the flanking maneuver being implemented by none other then Ralph Nader. Nader is demanding a recount in New Hampshire of all places (a state Kerry one). He's specifically wanting recounts in relatively urban areas that voted much more heavily for Bush this time then last time. Here is where it gets really interesting. These areas voted with the Diebold optical scanners, and a recount would be done by humans.
Where else were Diebold optical scanners used... why in Florida, specifically in those counties where Bush won handedly, in fact getting much more votes then Republican voters. Now that could be legitimate... it is Dixiecrat land, but depending on what happens in the New Hampshire recount... something else may be revealed.
Which leaves us to today's "election fraud?" round up:
Now this isn't a big number but a paperless voting machine in Texas refused to give the results of 63 votes... it just didn't want to spill the beans. Even the manufacturer (one Diebold Election Systems) couldn't get the machines to work. In the end the votes are going to Canada in attempt to get them to count.
Some citizens are wanting to go to Canada because of the election result, well now we're learning our actual results are going to Canada. This is beyond pathetic.
Information from Put It on Paper: Election snafu points up problems for all-electronic voting.
BROOKVILLE, Ind. - Election equipment counted straight-party votes for Democratic candidates as Libertarian votes, an error that could affect election outcomes in as many as nine counties, the Richmond Palladium-Item reported today.
Democrats discovered the error in Franklin County, where ballots will be counted again tonight.
No they weren't Diebold machines.
All of this has been great for statisticians, people generally not invited to many parties. Well now it is their hour, and they are playing it to the hilt.
The likelihood of any two of these statistical anomalies occurring together is on the order of one-in-a-million. The odds against all three occurring together are 250 million to one. As much as we can say in social science that something is impossible, it is impossible that the discrepancies between predicted and actual vote counts in the three critical battleground states of the 2004 election could have been due to chance or random error.
This is a "team" blog. We are a bunch of
Americans, whose rising distress
in our leader's decisions brought us together to make this site.
As Bush said, he's a "uniter." Many of us have never even met.
That's the internet for you.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the
president, or that we are to stand by the president, right or wrong, is
not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the
American people."
- Teddy Roosevelt
"Government has a final responsibility for the well-being of
its citizenship. If private cooperative endeavor fails to provide work
for willing hands and relief for the unfortunate, those suffering
hardship from no fault of their own have a right to call upon the
Government for aid; and a government worthy of its name must make
fitting response."
- Franklin Delano Roosevelt
"I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and Constitutions, but laws must and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change, with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors."
- Thomas Jefferson
"The means of defense against foreign danger historically have become the instruments of tyranny at home."
"All men having power ought to be distrusted to a certain
degree."
- James Madison
"I believe in human dignity as the source of national purpose, in human liberty as the source of national action, in the human heart as the source of national compassion, and in the human mind as the source of our invention and our ideas. It is, I believe, the faith in our fellow citizens as individuals and as people that lies at the heart of the liberal faith. For liberalism is not so much a party creed or set of fixed platform promises as it is an attitude of mind and heart, a faith in man's ability through the experiences of his reason and judgment to increase for himself and his fellow men the amount of justice and freedom and brotherhood which all human life deserves." - John F. Kennedy
"Should any political party attempt to abolish social security, unemployment insurance, and eliminate labor laws and farm programs, you would not hear of that party again in our political history. There is a tiny splinter group, of course, that believes you can do these things. Among them are [a] few other Texas oil millionaires, and an occasional politician or business man from other areas. Their number is negligible and they are stupid."
- Dwight D. Eisenhower
More Sites we often
like:
more coming...
"There's nothing wrong with America that can't be fixed by what's right with America." - Bill Clinton.
Hey, this is what our banner looks like. You like it?
Hey, feel free to put it on your site and link it to here.
We'd really appreciate it.
you don't have to of course, but if you do that's great.